An Open-Label Study of the Impact of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Single Oral and Intravenous Doses of Omadacycline.

Omadacycline is a once-daily oral or intravenous (i.v.) aminomethylcycline antibiotic approved in the United States for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) in adults. Omadacycline pharmacokinetics were characterized in 18 patients with hepatic impairment and 12 matched healthy subjects. Patients with hepatic impairment received i.v. omadacycline at 100 mg (mild hepatic impairment) or 50 mg (moderate and severe hepatic impairment) and oral omadacycline at 300 mg (mild hepatic impairment) or 150 mg (moderate hepatic impairment); oral omadacycline was not evaluated in those with severe hepatic impairment. Safety monitoring included the collection of adverse events (AEs), performance of laboratory tests, determination of vital signs, and performance of electrocardiograms. Omadacycline exposures were similar in patients with hepatic impairment and healthy subjects following i.v. or oral administration, with the geometric mean ratios for the area under the concentration-time curve and the maximum drug concentration ranging from 0.79 to 1.42. Omadacycline was safe and well tolerated. Overall, 13/30 (43.3%) participants experienced an AE; those occurring in more than 1 participant included headache (13.3%), nausea (6.7%), infusion-site pain (6.7%), contusion (6.7%), and dizziness (6.7%), with no differences based on the degree of hepatic impairment or the route of administration. Asymptomatic increases in heart rate were observed; none was considered an AE. These findings suggest that no omadacycline dose adjustment is warranted in patients with hepatic impairment.

Health-Related Quality of Life as Measured by the 12-Item Short-Form Survey Among Adults With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia who Received Either Lefamulin or Moxifloxacin in 2 Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Interest in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as part of benefit-risk assessment for new drug approvals is increasing. Lefamulin is the first intravenous (IV) and oral pleuromutilin antibiotic for treatment of adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was prospectively incorporated in its CABP trials (Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia [LEAP] 1 and 2) via the 12-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-12), a widely used PRO that measures general health status in 8 domains. METHODS: HRQoL was evaluated by SF-12 at baseline and test of cure (TOC; 5-10 days after the last study drug dose) in patients who received lefamulin or moxifloxacin in LEAP 1 (IV/oral treatment) and LEAP 2 (oral-only treatment). SF-12 outcomes included the 8 domains, physical component and mental component summary scores, and the Short-Form Six-Dimension health utility score. RESULTS: Analysis included 1215 patients (lefamulin: n = 607; moxifloxacin: n = 608). At baseline, all mean SF-12 scores in both treatment groups were well below the United States reference mean. Clinically meaningful and significant improvements from baseline to TOC were observed in all SF-12 scores. No significant differences in mean score improvements from baseline to TOC between treatment groups were observed. SF-12 score improvements at TOC across predefined subgroups were comparable between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that adults with CABP experienced comparable HRQoL improvements with lefamulin relative to moxifloxacin, and treatment with either agent resulted in returns to population norm HRQoL levels. These data suggest that lefamulin is a potential alternative to moxifloxacin for treatment of adults with CABP.

Post Hoc Assessment of Time to Clinical Response Among Adults Hospitalized with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia Who Received Either Lefamulin or Moxifloxacin in 2 Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Clinical Trials.

Time to clinical response, a proxy for hospital "discharge readiness," was compared between CABP inpatients who received lefamulin or moxifloxacin in the Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP) trials. The analysis included 926 inpatients. A short and comparable median time to clinical response (4 days) was observed in both treatment groups.

A phase 1 evaluation of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interaction of the anti-malarial agents KAF156 and piperaquine.

BACKGROUND: KAF156 is a novel imidazolopiperazine anti-malarial with activity against pre-erythrocytic liver stages, asexual and sexual blood stages. Based on in vitro data, a two-way pharmacokinetic interaction was hypothesized for KAF156 use in combination with piperaquine (PPQ) as both drugs are CYP3A4 substrates and inhibitors. Potential combination effects on the QT interval were also assessed. METHODS: This was an open-label, parallel-group, single-dose study in healthy volunteers randomized to three parallel arms (1:1:1) of 800 mg KAF156 + 1280 mg PPQ, 800 mg KAF156 alone and 1280 mg PPQ alone. Triplicate ECGs were done up to 48 h post-dose. Routine safety and pharmacokinetic assessments were carried out up to 61 days. RESULTS: Of the 72 healthy male subjects recruited, 68 completed the study. Co-administration of PPQ and KAF156 had no overall effect on AUC of either compound, but the Cmax values of both KAF156 (~ 23%) and piperaquine (~ 70%) increased. Both drugs given alone or in combination were well tolerated with no deaths or serious adverse events (SAEs). AEs were observed at the frequency of 87.5, 79.2 and 58.3% respectively for KAF156 + PPQ, PPQ and KAF156 arms. The most common AEs were nausea and headache. There were no Grade 3 or 4 events. There were no ECG related AEs, no QTcF interval > 480 ms and no QTcF interval increase from baseline > 60 ms. There was a positive ∆QTcF trend in the KAF156 + PPQ arm when either KAF156 or piperaquine concentration increases, but there was no significant difference between the combination arm and other arms in maximum ∆QTcF. CONCLUSIONS: No safety/cardiac risk or drug interaction was identified which would preclude use of a KAF156 and PPQ combination in future studies.

Bioavailability of Lumefantrine Is Significantly Enhanced with a Novel Formulation Approach, an Outcome from a Randomized, Open-Label Pharmacokinetic Study in Healthy Volunteers.

The artemether-lumefantrine combination requires food intake for the optimal absorption of lumefantrine. In an attempt to enhance the bioavailability of lumefantrine, new solid dispersion formulations (SDF) were developed, and the pharmacokinetics of two SDF variants were assessed in a randomized, open-label, sequential two-part study in healthy volunteers. In part 1, the relative bioavailability of the two SDF variants was compared with that of the conventional formulation after administration of a single dose of 480 mg under fasted conditions in three parallel cohorts. In part 2, the pharmacokinetics of lumefantrine from both SDF variants were evaluated after a single dose of 480 mg under fed conditions and a single dose of 960 mg under fasted conditions. The bioavailability of lumefantrine from SDF variant 1 and variant 2 increased up to ∼48-fold and ∼24-fold, respectively, relative to that of the conventional formulation. Both variants demonstrated a positive food effect and a less than proportional increase in exposure between the 480-mg and 960-mg doses. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate in severity and not suspected to be related to the study drug. All five drug-related AEs occurred in subjects taking SDF variant 2. No clinically significant treatment-emergent changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms, or laboratory blood assessments were noted. The solid dispersion formulation enhances the lumefantrine bioavailability to a significant extent, and SDF variant 1 is superior to SDF variant 2.

Clinical disposition, metabolism and in vitro drug-drug interaction properties of omadacycline.

1. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, transport and elimination properties of omadacycline, an aminomethylcycline antibiotic, were investigated in vitro and in a study in healthy male subjects. 2. Omadacycline was metabolically stable in human liver microsomes and hepatocytes and did not inhibit or induce any of the nine cytochrome P450 or five transporters tested. Omadacycline was a substrate of P-glycoprotein, but not of the other transporters. 3. Omadacycline metabolic stability was confirmed in six healthy male subjects who received a single 300 mg oral dose of [14C]-omadacycline (36.6 µCi). Absorption was rapid with peak radioactivity (∼610 ngEq/mL) between 1-4 h in plasma or blood. The AUClast of plasma radioactivity (only quantifiable to 8 h due to low radioactivity) was 3096 ngEq h/mL and apparent terminal half-life was 11.1 h. Unchanged omadacycline reached peak plasma concentrations (∼563 ng/mL) between 1-4 h. Apparent plasma half-life was 17.6 h with biphasic elimination. Plasma exposure (AUCinf) averaged 9418 ng h/mL, with high clearance (CL/F, 32.8 L/h) and volume of distribution (Vz/F 828 L). No plasma metabolites were observed. 4. Radioactivity recovery of the administered dose in excreta was complete (>95%); renal and fecal elimination were 14.4% and 81.1%, respectively. No metabolites were observed in urine or feces, only the omadacycline C4-epimer.

Randomized, Open-Label Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Oral and Intravenous Administration of Omadacycline to Healthy Subjects.

Omadacycline is a first-in-class aminomethylcycline antibiotic with microbiological activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes and atypical bacteria that is being developed for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The bioavailability of a phase 3 tablet formulation relative to that obtained via intravenous (i.v.) administration (and of other oral formulations relative to that of the phase 3 tablet) was investigated in an open-label, randomized, four-period, crossover study with healthy subjects age 18 to 50 years. Subjects received omadacycline at 100 mg i.v., 300 mg orally as two different tablet formulations with different dissolution profiles, and 300 mg as an oral solution. Plasma omadacycline concentrations were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Twenty of 24 subjects completed all treatment periods. The two tablet formulations produced equivalent total exposures. The phase 3 tablet produced an exposure equivalent to that of the 100-mg i.v. dose, with a geometric mean ratio (90% confidence intervals [CI]) for area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity [AUC∞]) of 1.00 (0.93, 1.07). The absolute bioavailability of the tablets was approximately 34.5%. Intersubject variability was consistent among the oral formulations (∼20 to 25%). Single oral and i.v. doses of omadacycline were well tolerated; three subjects experienced mild adverse events (dizziness, nausea, and vomiting) that resolved without intervention. A 300-mg dose of the tablet formulation of omadacycline intended for use in phase 3 studies produced a total exposure equivalent to that of a 100-mg i.v. dose.

KAE609 (Cipargamin), a New Spiroindolone Agent for the Treatment of Malaria: Evaluation of the Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion of a Single Oral 300-mg Dose of [14C]KAE609 in Healthy Male Subjects.

KAE609 [(1'R,3'S)-5,7'-dichloro-6'-fluoro-3'-methyl-2',3',4',9'-tetrahydrospiro[indoline-3,1'-pyridol[3,4-b]indol]-2-one] is a potent, fast-acting, schizonticidal agent in clinical development for the treatment of malaria. This study investigated the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of KAE609 after oral administration of [(14)C]KAE609 in healthy subjects. After oral administration to human subjects, KAE609 was the major radioactive component (approximately 76% of the total radioactivity in plasma); M23 was the major circulating oxidative metabolite (approximately 12% of the total radioactivity in plasma). Several minor oxidative metabolites (M14, M16, M18, and M23.5B) were also identified, each accounting for approximately 3%-8% of the total radioactivity in plasma. KAE609 was well absorbed and extensively metabolized, such that KAE609 accounted for approximately 32% of the dose in feces. The elimination of KAE609 and metabolites was primarily mediated via biliary pathways. M23 was the major metabolite in feces. Subjects reported semen discoloration after dosing in prior studies; therefore, semen samples were collected once from each subject to further evaluate this clinical observation. Radioactivity excreted in semen was negligible, but the major component in semen was M23, supporting the rationale that this yellow-colored metabolite was the main source of semen discoloration. In this study, a new metabolite, M16, was identified in all biologic matrices albeit at low levels. All 19 recombinant human cytochrome P450 enzymes were capable of catalyzing the hydroxylation of M23 to form M16 even though the extent of turnover was very low. Thus, electrochemistry was used to generate a sufficient quantity of M16 for structural elucidation. Metabolic pathways of KAE609 in humans are summarized herein and M23 is the major metabolite in plasma and excreta.

Open-label, single-dose, parallel-group study in healthy volunteers to determine the drug-drug interaction potential between KAE609 (cipargamin) and piperaquine.

KAE609 represents a new class of potent, fast-acting, schizonticidal antimalarials. This study investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics of KAE609 in combination with the long-acting antimalarial piperaquine (PPQ) in healthy volunteers. A two-way pharmacokinetic interaction was hypothesized for KAE609 and PPQ, as both drugs are CYP3A4 substrates and inhibitors. The potential for both agents to affect the QT interval was also assessed. This was an open-label, parallel-group, single-dose study with healthy volunteers. Subjects were randomized to four parallel dosing arms with five cohorts (2:2:2:2:1), receiving 75 mg KAE609 plus 320 mg PPQ, 25 mg KAE609 plus 1,280 mg PPQ, 25 mg KAE609 alone, 320 mg PPQ alone, or 1,280 mg PPQ alone. Triplicate electrocardiograms were performed over the first 24 h after dosing, with single electrocardiograms at other time points. Routine safety (up to 89 days) and pharmacokinetic (up to 61 days) assessments were performed. Of the 110 subjects recruited, 99 completed the study. Coadministration of PPQ had no overall effect on exposure to KAE609, although 1,280 mg PPQ decreased the KAE609 maximum concentration (Cmax) by 17%. The group that received 25 mg KAE609 plus 1,280 mg PPQ showed a 32% increase in the PPQ area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUCinf), while the group that received 75 mg KAE609 plus 320 mg PPQ showed a 14% reduction. Mean changes from baseline in the QT interval corrected by Fridericia's method (QTcF) and the QT interval corrected by Bazett's method (QTcB) with PPQ were consistent with its known effects. PPQ but not KAE609 exposure correlated with corrected QT interval (QTc) increases, and KAE609 did not affect the PPQ exposure-QTc relationship. The QTcF effect for PPQ (least-squares estimate of the difference in mean maximal changes from baseline of 7.47 ms [90% confidence interval, 3.55 to 11.4 ms]) was consistent with the criteria for a positive thorough QT study. No subject had QTcF or QTcB values of >500 ms. Both drugs given alone or in combination were well tolerated, with no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs), or severe AEs reported. Most AEs were mild; upper respiratory tract infections, headache, diarrhea, and oropharyngeal pain were most common. PPQ and KAE609 coadministration had no relevant effect on exposure to either agent, and KAE609 did not affect or potentiate the known effects of PPQ on cardiac conduction.

Randomized, controlled pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of albinterferon in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Albinterferon is a fusion of albumin and interferon-α2b developed to improve the pharmacokinetics, convenience, and potential efficacy of interferon-α for the treatment of chronic hepatitis infections. METHODS: This open-label, randomized, active-controlled, multicenter study investigated the safety and efficacy of albinterferon in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection who were e-antigen (HBeAg) positive. One hundred and forty-one patients received one of four albinterferon doses/regimens or pegylated-interferon-α2a. Primary efficacy outcomes were changes in serum HBeAg and antibody, HBV-DNA, and alanine aminotransferase. Principal safety outcomes were changes in laboratory values, pulmonary function, and adverse events. RESULTS: The study was prematurely terminated as phase III trials in hepatitis C infection indicated noninferior efficacy but inferior safety compared with pegylated-interferon-α2a. Here, all treatment groups had a significant reduction in HBV-DNA from baseline. Reductions in HBV-DNA were not significantly different, except the 1200 µg every 4 weeks albinterferon dose which was inferior compared with pegylated-interferon-α2a. The serum alanine aminotransferase levels decreased in all arms. The per-patient incidence of adverse events was not significantly different for albinterferon (96.4-100%) and pegylated-interferon-α2a (93.1%). Total adverse events, however, were higher for albinterferon and correlated to dose. Decreased lung function was found in all arms (∼93% of patients), and was more common in some albinterferon groups. CONCLUSIONS: Albinterferon doses with similar anti-HBV efficacy to pegylated-interferon-α2a had higher rates of certain adverse events, particularly changes in lung diffusion capacity (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov number NCT00964665).

Evaluation of two novel tablet formulations of artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem) for bioequivalence in a randomized, open-label, two-period study.

BACKGROUND: Artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem; AL) is a standard of care for malaria treatment as an oral six-dose regimen, given twice daily over three days with one to four tablets (20/120 mg) per dose, depending on patient body weight. In order to reduce the pill burden at each dose and potentially enhance compliance, two novel fixed-dose tablet formulations (80/480 mg and 60/360 mg) have been developed and tested in this study for bioequivalence with their respective number of standard tablets. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, two-period, single-dose, within formulation crossover bioequivalence study comparing artemether and lumefantrine exposure between the novel 80/480 mg tablet and four standard tablets, and the novel 60/360 mg tablet and three standard tablets, was conducted in 120 healthy subjects under fed conditions. Artemether, dihydroartemisinin, and lumefantrine were measured in plasma by HPLC/UPLC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were determined by non-compartmental analyses. RESULTS: Adjusted geometric mean AUClast for artemether were 345 and 364 ng·h/mL (geometric mean ratio (GMR) 0.95; 90% CI 0.89-1.01) and for lumefantrine were 219 and 218 µg·h/mL (GMR 1.00; 90% CI 0.93-1.08) for 80/480 mg tablet versus four standard tablets, respectively. Corresponding Cmax for artemether were 96.8 and 99.7 ng/mL (GMR 0.97; 90% CI 0.89-1.06) and for lumefantrine were 8.42 and 8.71 µg/mL (GMR 0.97; 90% CI 0.89-1.05). For the 60/360 mg tablet versus three standard tablets, adjusted geometric mean AUClast for artemether were 235 and 231 ng·h/mL (GMR 1.02; 90% CI 0.94-1.10), and for lumefantrine were 160 and 180 µg·h/mL (GMR 0.89; 90% CI 0.83-0.96), respectively. Corresponding Cmax for artemether were 75.5 and 71.5 ng/mL (GMR 1.06; 90% CI 0.95-1.18), and for lumefantrine were 6.64 and 7.61 µg/mL (GMR 0.87; 90% CI 0.81-0.94), respectively. GMR for Cmax and AUClast for artemether and lumefantrine for all primary comparisons were within the bioequivalence acceptance criteria (0.80-1.25). In addition, secondary PK parameters also met bioequivalence criterion. CONCLUSION: Both of the novel artemether-lumefantrine tablet formulations evaluated are bioequivalent to their respective standard Coartem tablet doses. These novel formulations are easy to administer and may improve adherence in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2011/12/002256.

Phase I, open-label, single-dose study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of telbivudine in children and adolescents with chronic hepatitis B.

Telbivudine is a nucleoside analogue that has been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in adults at 600 mg/day. We conducted a phase I, open-label, first-in-pediatrics study to investigate the safety and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of telbivudine in HBV-infected children and adolescents. Eligible patients were enrolled sequentially from older to younger groups, with evaluation of safety and available pharmacokinetic data after each stratum. Adolescent patients (>12 to 18 years) received a single dose of 600 mg telbivudine as an oral solution, while children aged 2 to 12 years received a single dose of 15 or 25 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 600 mg. Telbivudine was well tolerated; all adverse events were mild, and none occurred in more than one patient. The plasma telbivudine concentration-versus-time profiles in adolescents given 600 mg were similar to the mean profile of healthy adults receiving the same oral dose. Children aged 2 to <6 and 6 to 12 years receiving a single 15-mg/kg dose showed similar plasma exposures. To predict the steady-state exposure, plasma concentration-versus-time profiles for patients aged 2 to 12 years (15 mg/kg) and >12 to 18 years (600 mg) were fitted to a two-compartment 1st-order, microconstant, lag time, 1st-order elimination pharmacokinetic (PK) model. This analysis predicted the following dosages to mimic exposures in healthy adults receiving 600 mg/day: 20 mg/kg/day for children 2 to 12 years and 600 mg/day for adolescents. Studies are ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of the recommended dose in pediatric patients. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00907894.).

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response of albinterferon alfa-2b.

Albinterferon alfa-2b (albIFN) has been studied for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). A population pharmacokinetics model was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Efficacy/safety exposure-response relationships were assessed for subcutaneous albIFN doses (900-1800 µg once every 2 or 4 weeks) administered for either 24 weeks (HCV genotypes 2/3) or 48 weeks (genotype 1), plus daily oral ribavirin. Sustained virologic response (SVR) exposure-response was modeled using logistic regression. Adverse event incidence was tabulated versus exposure quartiles. First-order absorption rate constant (0.0148 h(-1)), apparent clearance (38.9 mL/h), and apparent volume of distribution (11.6 L) had interindividual variances (coefficient of variation) of 21%, 34%, and 24%, respectively. Residual variance estimates were 27% (coefficient of variation) and 1.51 ng/mL (standard deviation). For the only explanatory covariate-body weight-exposure decreased as weight increased. Important SVR predictors included baseline HCV RNA, fibrosis score, and black race (genotype 1); SVR was minimally related to exposure. Most adverse events had similar incidence rates across exposure quartiles. Some adverse events had a higher incidence in the upper exposure quartile without evidence of exposure-response across the lower quartiles. Given the lack of consistent efficacy/safety exposure-response relationships, further investigation is necessary to optimize albIFN dosing.

Dose range evaluation of Mycograb C28Y variant, a human recombinant antibody fragment to heat shock protein 90, in combination with amphotericin B-desoxycholate for treatment of murine systemic candidiasis.

Systemic candidiasis causes significant mortality in patients despite amphotericin B (AMB) therapy. Mycograb C28Y variant, a human recombinant antibody fragment to heat shock protein 90, is closely related to Mycograb, which showed a survival advantage in combination with AMB in a phase III human trial. The Mycograb C28Y variant could potentially increase the antifungal effect of AMB. In our study, the interaction between AMB-desoxycholate (DAMB) and the Mycograb C28Y variant was characterized in vitro by using a checkerboard method. Quantitative cultures of kidneys, livers, and spleens of neutropenic mice with systemic Candida albicans infections were used to assess the in vivo interaction between 1.4 mg/kg of body weight/day of DAMB and 0.15, 1.5, and 15 mg/kg/day of the Mycograb C28Y variant after 1, 3, and 5 days of therapy. DAMB and Mycograb C28Y variant monotherapies, vehicle, and a no-treatment arm served as controls. Also, single- and multidose pharmacokinetics for the Mycograb C28Y variant were determined. Indifference or synergy between DAMB and the Mycograb C28Y variant was seen in two trials by the checkerboard method. The pharmacokinetics of the Mycograb C28Y variant was best described by a 2-compartment model with a median serum t(1/2)(α) of ~0.198 h and a t(1/2)(ß) of ~1.77 h. In mice, DAMB together with the Mycograb C28Y variant was no more effective than AMB alone (P > 0.05 by analysis of variance). The Mycograb C28Y variant alone had no antifungal activity. We therefore conclude that the Mycograb C28Y variant in combination with DAMB offered no benefit over DAMB monotherapy in a neutropenic murine model of systemic candidiasis.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of albinterferon alfa-2b in subjects with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis compared to those in matched healthy volunteers.

Albinterferon alfa-2b (albIFN) is being developed, in combination with ribavirin, for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a 900-µg dose of albIFN administered as a single subcutaneous injection in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on hemodialysis and matched healthy volunteers (by age [±5 years], weight [±5 kg], and gender). The maximum concentration in plasma (C(max)) and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-∞)) were 42.8 ± 14.0 ng/ml and 16,414 ± 4,203 ng·h/ml, respectively, for healthy volunteers, while the C(max) and AUC(0-∞) were 49.9 ± 20.9 ng/ml and 18,919 ± 8,008 ng·h/ml, respectively, for ESRD patients. The geometric least-squares mean ratios were 1.15 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.78, 1.68) for C(max) and 1.11 (90% CI, 0.83, 1.48) for AUC(0-∞). Adverse events were as expected for an interferon (e.g., flu-like symptoms), with the main laboratory adverse event being a decline in total white blood cell count, which was specifically related to a decline in the neutrophil count. This effect was somewhat greater in the ESRD patients, with the maximal decreases in neutrophil counts from those at the baseline being (-2.6 ± 0.32) × 10(9) and (-2.19 ± 0.58) × 10(9) cells/liter for the ESRD patients and the healthy volunteers, respectively. This study indicates no significant effect of renal failure on the pharmacokinetics of albIFN. Safety and tolerability were as expected for an interferon.

Interaction between fosamprenavir, with and without ritonavir, and nevirapine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects.

Fosamprenavir (FPV) with and without ritonavir (RTV) was added to the antiretroviral regimens of human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects receiving nevirapine (NVP) to evaluate this drug interaction. Significant reductions in plasma amprenavir exposure (25 to 35%) were observed following coadministration of 1,400 mg of FPV twice a day (BID) and 200 mg of NVP BID. A regimen of 700 mg of FPV BID plus 100 mg of RTV BID may be coadministered with NVP without dose adjustment.

Single-dose safety and pharmacokinetics of brecanavir, a novel human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor.

Brecanavir (BCV, 640385) is a novel, potent protease inhibitor (PI) with low nanomolar 50% inhibitory concentrations against PI-resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in vitro. This phase I, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-part single-dose study (first time with humans) was conducted to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of BCV administered at 10 mg/ml in a tocopherol-polyethylene glycol succinate-polyethylene glycol 400-ethanol 50:40:10 solution. In part 1 of the study, single oral doses of BCV ranged from 25 mg to 800 mg. In part 2, single oral doses of BCV ranged from 10 mg to 300 mg and were coadministered with 100-mg oral ritonavir (RTV) soft gel capsules. Single doses of BCV and BCV/RTV were generally well tolerated. There were no severe adverse events (SAEs), and no subject was withdrawn due to BCV. The most commonly reported drug-related AEs during both parts of the study combined were gastrointestinal disturbances (similar to placebo) and headache. BCV was readily absorbed following oral administration with mean times to maximum concentration from >1 h to 2.5 h in part 1 and from 1.5 h to 3 h in part 2. Administration of BCV without RTV resulted in BCV exposures predicted to be insufficient to inhibit PI-resistant virus based on in vitro data. Coadministration of 300 mg BCV with 100 mg RTV, however, significantly increased the plasma BCV area under the concentration-time curve and maximum concentration 26-fold and 11-fold, respectively, achieving BCV concentrations predicted to inhibit PI-resistant HIV.

Effect of antacids and ranitidine on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of fosamprenavir.

Single doses of MAALOX TC and ranitidine were administered separately with 1,400 mg of fosamprenavir (FPV). MAALOX TC decreased the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)) for plasma amprenavir (APV) by 18% and the maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)) by 35%; the plasma APV concentration at 12 h (C(12)) increased by 14%. Ranitidine at 300 mg decreased the AUC(0-24) for plasma APV by 30% and C(max) by 51%; C(12) was unchanged. FPV may be coadministered with antacids without concern and without separation in dosing; however, caution is recommended when FPV is coadministered with histamine(2)- receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of amprenavir-containing combination therapy in HIV-1-infected children.

Several factors influence the antiviral response to antiretroviral therapy. In this pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis, the relationship of drug exposure, demographics, and cotherapy measures to antiviral response in a cohort of largely treatment-experienced children treated with amprenavir and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors was examined. Multiple pharmacodynamic and demographic factors were examined, but only the minimum plasma concentration (C(min))/protein-binding-adjusted 50% inhibitory drug concentration (IC(50)) ratio and whether individuals received 2 versus fewer than 2 nucleosides to which their viral isolates were susceptible were associated with the magnitude of the time-weighted average change in HIV-1 RNA log(10) copies/mL from baseline (AAUCMB). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only the C(min)/IC(50) ratio was independently associated with having a >or=1 log(10) AAUCMB decline. The probability in the study population of having a >or=1log(10) AAUCMB was 50% and 85% at C(min)/IC(50) ratios of approximately 1 and 4, respectively. Of the multiple factors examined, only the C(min)/IC(50) ratio was a significant predictor of antiviral response in the first 8 weeks on amprenavir-containing combination antiretroviral therapy.